| | Your views on aging fighters? | |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
WhatThe...

Number of posts: 112 Registration date: 2006-08-17
 | Subject: Your views on aging fighters? Fri Nov 10, 2006 5:16 am | |
| Nick,
I notice Lennox Lewis is very seriously considering a comeback at 43 or 44 years old – see http://www.ringsidereport.com/Lepak172005.htm.
Tommy ‘Hitman’ Hearns, who would probably be older than Lewis, apparently still trains his butt off in the gym and would fight again if the right deal fell in his lap.
Okay, in the case of Tyson, he’s a chump and has run out of money. But with Lewis and George Foreman not long back, it doesn’t seem to be about the money.
What are your views on aging prize fighters getting back into the ring again and again, comeback after comeback? |
|
 | |
Nick Hughes

Number of posts: 2970 Localisation: USA Registration date: 2006-08-14
 | Subject: Re: Your views on aging fighters? Fri Nov 10, 2006 5:43 am | |
| Not really my area of expertise mate...but I'll do my best to give you an answer.
Years ago it was of course unheard of until George Foreman proved it could be done. I think the reason is probably the superior training methods and diet etc that modern athletes have over their counterparts of yesteryear.
There's no hiding in the ring...if they can't cut the mustard it will show up pretty fast. Hell, maybe that should have a veterans division like the do in some sports for athletes over forty for example.
What about you...what do you think?
Nick |
|
 | |
Alan Bec Guest
 | Subject: Re: Your views on aging fighters? Fri Nov 10, 2006 6:34 am | |
| As I get older I still enjoy training dont get me wrong I dont want to be punished by trying to keep up with the younger guys and I have never been one for the ring but when you have enjoyed training for a long number of years you dont want to just give up.
Some of the older fighters that you see look out of shape and slow, this is because they are still mixing it with younger fitter guys as Nick said there should be a veterans division for those who still want to do it, just like there is unlicensed boxing and blue collar boxing.
A place for everything and everything in it's place.
Alan |
|
 | |
Nick Miles
Number of posts: 128 Age: 45 Registration date: 2006-08-14
 | Subject: Re: Your views on aging fighters? Fri Nov 10, 2006 6:52 am | |
| | Nick Hughes wrote: | Not really my area of expertise mate...but I'll do my best to give you an answer.
Nick |
I must disagree with you there Nick
After all, your old & you have had your fair share of fights
Nick |
|
 | |
Nick Hughes

Number of posts: 2970 Localisation: USA Registration date: 2006-08-14
 | Subject: Re: Your views on aging fighters? Fri Nov 10, 2006 2:18 pm | |
| alright miles...wanker He did ask about aging prize fighters not aging antipodeans who've had a lot of fights...and my only "prize" fight was done when I was eighteen or so (TKO round III of VI) so I'll stick by my original claim. Nick _________________ Hard pressed on my right. My center is yielding. Impossible to maneuver. Situation excellent. I am attacking.
--Ferdinand Foch-- at the Battle of the Marne
my author's page Amazon
My Krav School
My Tattoo Studio
|
|
 | |
Jeff Menapace

Number of posts: 921 Age: 38 Registration date: 2006-08-14
 | Subject: Re: Your views on aging fighters? Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:04 pm | |
| Mind if I jump in Nick?
I think the fighters that fight past their prime (with some degree of success) possess two important attributes:
1) A hard punch 2) The ability to take a hard punch
Fighters that rely on speed and natural gifts don't last too long as their reflexes tend to go (Roy Jones, Holyfield etc.) |
|
 | |
Nick Miles
Number of posts: 128 Age: 45 Registration date: 2006-08-14
 | Subject: Re: Your views on aging fighters? Fri Nov 10, 2006 10:24 pm | |
| I must admit that I only read the thread title and couldn't resist my retort old chap. I stand corrected. Yours in youth Nick PS nothing wrong with a bit of self abuse now & again  |
|
 | |
WhatThe...

Number of posts: 112 Registration date: 2006-08-17
 | Subject: What about you….what do you think? Sun Nov 12, 2006 10:29 pm | |
| I reckon in most cases it’s a bit sad really Nick.
On the one hand they are grown men and should be able to make their own decisions. But on the other it’s almost like they need someone – perhaps their mother (getting old by now!) or wife – to drag them out of it by the ear.
The idea of a senior division may have merit. If it was run properly, professionally etc, and they fought lesser rounds – perhaps 8 x 2 minute rounds - it could work.
It'd certainly draw crowd interest. But these guys tend to expect Millions every time they climb in, and I don't know if Millions could be generated by a senior division. |
|
 | |
peter skillen
Number of posts: 560 Registration date: 2006-08-25
 | Subject: Re: Your views on aging fighters? Mon Nov 13, 2006 3:09 pm | |
| watch -this till the e-+nd to see how an aged fighter can punch..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xzm1uX6poE4 |
|
 | |
Chris Moderator

Number of posts: 1784 Localisation: North East UK Registration date: 2006-08-14
 | Subject: Re: Your views on aging fighters? Mon Nov 13, 2006 3:24 pm | |
| the punch is the last thing to go. _________________ “ I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him. -- Mark Twain.”
|
|
 | |
| | Your views on aging fighters? | |
|